AC&YHS Free-Mo Modular Layout Proposal
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 11:05 pm
AC&Y Historical Society Modular Layout Proposal
Submitted by Matt Woods, Sat., February 11, 2012
Objective: To provide an opportunity for members of the AC&YHS to replicate key localities of the AC&Y and various interchanges in modular form and come together occasionally to combine these modules to form much of the original AC&Y trackage. Potential occasions for the assembly of the modular layout would include the annual meeting and various train shows. The ultimate benefit of this endeavor is the perpetuation of the AC&Y in miniature and the ability to use the modular layout for educational purposes and historical reenactment. The layout could also serve to attract new and more members.
Key Considerations: I would recommend that the modules be built to free-mo standards
which are a much more flexible and potentially realistic means of replicating prototype
locations and operations. In other words, the free-mo concept lends itself to point-to-point operation and the simulation of the single track mainline which was the AC&Y’s dominant feature. The free-mo format is much more conducive to the alternating of key towns and interchanges interspersed with areas of rural scenery.
Modelgenic Locations on the AC&Y:
Going from East to West:
(1) Akron/Brittain Yard
(2) Copley
(3) Medina
(4) Spencer
(5) Carey
(6) Columbus Grove
(7) Delphos
I’m sure there are other important locations that people would be interested in modeling or including in a comprehensive depiction of the AC&Y.
The modules according to free-mo design would vary in length and width according to the location being modeled. Various members could combine or work together for some of the key locations. The only standardized criteria from module to module would be the maintenance and alignment of the mainline.
Other Considerations:
According to the number of interested members or participants, the key locations would be chosen or assigned. There would need to be agreement on code of rail, wiring and operating system. Certain modeling standards would also have to be adhered to including continuity and uniformity of scenery and prototypicalness of key structures or trackage arrangements. Before any modules were built, it would be imperative that there be communication and agreement amongst the participants. This project could be an ongoing endeavor that can grow and expand over time and could certainly be enjoyed operationally without full completion of scenic and structure detail.
Submitted by Matt Woods, Sat., February 11, 2012
Objective: To provide an opportunity for members of the AC&YHS to replicate key localities of the AC&Y and various interchanges in modular form and come together occasionally to combine these modules to form much of the original AC&Y trackage. Potential occasions for the assembly of the modular layout would include the annual meeting and various train shows. The ultimate benefit of this endeavor is the perpetuation of the AC&Y in miniature and the ability to use the modular layout for educational purposes and historical reenactment. The layout could also serve to attract new and more members.
Key Considerations: I would recommend that the modules be built to free-mo standards
which are a much more flexible and potentially realistic means of replicating prototype
locations and operations. In other words, the free-mo concept lends itself to point-to-point operation and the simulation of the single track mainline which was the AC&Y’s dominant feature. The free-mo format is much more conducive to the alternating of key towns and interchanges interspersed with areas of rural scenery.
Modelgenic Locations on the AC&Y:
Going from East to West:
(1) Akron/Brittain Yard
(2) Copley
(3) Medina
(4) Spencer
(5) Carey
(6) Columbus Grove
(7) Delphos
I’m sure there are other important locations that people would be interested in modeling or including in a comprehensive depiction of the AC&Y.
The modules according to free-mo design would vary in length and width according to the location being modeled. Various members could combine or work together for some of the key locations. The only standardized criteria from module to module would be the maintenance and alignment of the mainline.
Other Considerations:
According to the number of interested members or participants, the key locations would be chosen or assigned. There would need to be agreement on code of rail, wiring and operating system. Certain modeling standards would also have to be adhered to including continuity and uniformity of scenery and prototypicalness of key structures or trackage arrangements. Before any modules were built, it would be imperative that there be communication and agreement amongst the participants. This project could be an ongoing endeavor that can grow and expand over time and could certainly be enjoyed operationally without full completion of scenic and structure detail.